On 18/11/2011 12:53, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source >> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_9_0", if you use "." (head) >> you will get 10-CURRENT. If you would like to access the source tree >> via SVN it is "svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.0/". We still have >> the nit that the creation of a new SVN branch winds up causing what >> looks like a check-in of the entire tree in CVS (a side-effect of the >> svn2cvs exporter) so "mergemaster -F" is your friend if you are using >> csup/cvsup. > > About a couple days before seeing this message, or the message on the FreeBSD web site, but after seeing RC2 on the ftp.freebsd.org server, > I already ran csup with > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 > > Am I screwed, am I OK, or do I simply have to rerun csup with RELENG_9_0 instead of RELENG_9 ? RELENG_9 (cvs) = stable/9 (svn) = 9.N-STABLE (newvers.sh, `uname -r`) RELENG_9_0 (cvs) = releng/9.0 (svn) = 9.0-RELEASE (newvers.sh, uname) In short, if you want to use the 9.0-RELEASE (when it finally gets ready), then you need to switch to RELENG_9_0. If you prefer using -STABLE for your systems, then you're OK with RELENG_9. In case you don't know or are not quite sure about the differences between -RELEASE and -STABLE, I'd recommend switching to RELENG_9_0. > Again, I can't find that file (needle in the haystack) in /usr/src tree that shows version number such as RC2. This has already been answered, but just a quick note. If you've recently updated your sources using the RELENG_9 tag, you'll most likely see the version in newvers.sh as: REVISION="9.0" BRANCH="PRERELEASE" If you switch to RELENG_9_0 and update your sources again, you should see the familiar: REVISION="9.0" BRANCH="RC2" HTH, Luchesar -- i.dea.is/luchesarReceived on Fri Nov 18 2011 - 10:36:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:20 UTC