On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:40:42PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:56:20PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > I fully agree with an idea that compiler is not an authorative source > > of the knowledge of the FreeBSD version. Even more, I argue that we shall > > not rely on compiler for this at all. Ideally, we should be able to > > build FreeBSD using the stock compilers without local modifications. > > Thus relying on the symbols defined by compiler, and not the source > > is the thing to avoid and consistently remove. > > > > We must do this to be able to use third-party tooldchain for FreeBSD builds. > > > > That said, why not define __FreeBSD_kernel as equal to __FreeBSD_version ? > > And then make more strong wording about other systems that use the macro, > > e.g. remove 'may' from the kFreeBSD example. > > Also, please remove the smile from comment. > > Ok. New patch attached. And the last, question, why not do #ifndef __FreeBSD_kernel__ #define __FreeBSD_kernel__ __FreeBSD_version #endif ? #undef is too big tools tool apply there, IMO.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:20 UTC