On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:16:15AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > Hey Bruce, > > These sound like good suggestions, but I'd hoped to actually go through all these files with a fine-toothed comb to see which ones were still relevant. You've found a bunch of good areas to clean up, but I'd like to humbly suggest they be done in a follow-on commit. Hi, I'm sending a new patch. Thanks Bruce for your input. TTBOMK this corrects all the problems you spotted that were introduced by my patch. It doesn't fix pre-existing problems in the files however, except in cases where I had to modify that line anyway. I think it's a good compromise between my initial patch and an exhaustive cleanup of those headers (which I'm probably not the most indicate for). -- Robert Millan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC