> On 11/27/11, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local_at_be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > > "b. f." <bf1783_at_googlemail.com> writes: > >>> > > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel > >>> > > config file? > >>> > > Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but > >>> > > will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated? > >> They are redundant and incompatible. atapicam is deprecated, and > >> ATA_CAM is the new default on FreeBSD 9 and 10. Unless you have some > >> special requirements, you should use ATA_CAM on recent versions of > >> FreeBSD, because it usually performs better than the old ATA code, and > >> has added functionality. > > Ah. My apologies to anyone I confused with my incorrect comments. > > I must say that I'm thoroughly disappointed that my searches through the > > official documentation didn't turn up anything related to this. Even the > > Handbook, with extensive practical descriptions of how to use this > > functionality, doesn't mention that its advice is irrelevant to anything > > past 8.x. > The handbook does contain some oblique and scattered references to the > new code, or at least to constructs that are common to both the old > and the new code, but the addition of a brief discussion of the > differences between the new and old ATA code in the handbook -- i.e., > the kernel and userland components that are now obsolete, and their > replacements -- might be of some help to users. The primary author of > the new code did add some material to various notes and manpages, but > he has been very busy writing and debugging code, and English is not > his first language, so others will have to supplement his efforts. > Perhaps you could ask for some additions on the freebsd-doc mailing > list? > b. Now I see it's "options ATA_CAM" or "device atapicam". It looks like I inadvertently transposed "device" and "options" in subject line. Now I think I'll try to rebuild the kernel with "options ATA_CAM" and drop "device atapicam". This question needs to be better resolved in time for FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE. I cross-post this message to freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org so the developers will see it. FreeBSD users want to be able to burn CDs and DVDs, and since SCSI hardware has fallen out of style, I can say very few if any FreeBSD 9.0 users will have an actual SCSI CD or DVD drive. TomReceived on Mon Nov 28 2011 - 08:15:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC