On 11/28/2011 16:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <4ED4222E.5010707_at_FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes: >> On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote: > >>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by >>> default? >> >> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new >> system for at least a decade. >> >> Ideally we could do this for 9.0. > > Can we at least keep one (small) library compiled for profiling, so > that compiling for profiling doesn't get broken by accident ? I think WITH_PROFILE is probably a good idea for the tinderbox? -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/Received on Mon Nov 28 2011 - 23:35:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC