Re: incorrect use of pidfile(3)

From: Jos Backus <jos_at_catnook.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:16:01 -0700

Why not import daemontools? It's public domain these days. Pidfiles are a
hacky mess. UNIX already has a way to track processes which avoids all these
issues, with very little overhead.

Jos

Received on Fri Oct 14 2011 - 00:43:22 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Thomas Steen Rasmussen: "Re: 9.0-beta3 preferring ipv4 over ipv6 with ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES""
Previous message: Adrian Chadd: "Re: [RFC] Prepend timestamp in msgbuf"
In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: incorrect use of pidfile(3)"
Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: incorrect use of pidfile(3)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC