Re: 9.0-beta3 preferring ipv4 over ipv6 with ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES"

From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:38:04 +0900
Hi,

>>>>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:09:11 +0900 (JST)
>>>>> Hiroki Sato <hrs_at_FreeBSD.org> said:

hrs> Thomas Steen Rasmussen <thomas_at_gibfest.dk> wrote
hrs>   in <4E97D9F3.4020308_at_gibfest.dk>:

th> On 14.10.2011 08:14, Hiroki Sato wrote:
hrs> th> > telnet www.freebsd.org 80 < /dev/null
th> [tykling_at_tykburk ~]$ telnet www.freebsd.org 80 < /dev/null
th> Trying 69.147.83.34...
th> Connected to red.freebsd.org.
th> Escape character is '^]'.
th> Connection closed by foreign host.

hrs>  Thanks.  There is no problem with the source address selection.  The
hrs>  last questions are:

hrs>  % route get -inet www.freebsd.org
hrs>  % route get -inet6 www.freebsd.org
hrs>  % netstat -nrf inet6
hrs>  % ndp -r

hrs>  I guess the second one returns "route: writing to routing socket: No
hrs>  such process" on your box.  Is it correct?

AFAIK, recent Firefox implements Happy Eyeballs.  So, I suspect it
doesn't obey RFC 3484, anymore.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO _at_ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume_at_mahoroba.org  ume_at_{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Received on Fri Oct 14 2011 - 15:38:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC