On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I think, it's the time to enable the nxstack feature. Any comments, >>> pros, cons? >> >> I dragged the change long enough for it to miss the 9.0. >> After the 9.0 is released, I will flip the switch with the following >> change. >> >> diff --git a/sys/kern/imgact_elf.c b/sys/kern/imgact_elf.c >> index 8455f48..926fe64 100644 >> --- a/sys/kern/imgact_elf.c >> +++ b/sys/kern/imgact_elf.c >> _at__at_ -118,7 +118,12 _at__at_ static int elf_legacy_coredump = 0; >> SYSCTL_INT(_debug, OID_AUTO, __elfN(legacy_coredump), CTLFLAG_RW, >> &elf_legacy_coredump, 0, ""); >> >> -static int __elfN(nxstack) = 0; >> +int __elfN(nxstack) = >> +#if defined(__amd64__) || defined(__powerpc64__) /* both 64 and 32 bit */ >> > Why leaving 32bits x86 CPU supporting the NX feature behind ? Most likely because it was assumed that i386 doesn't fully support it. According to ye great Wikipedia, NX support didn't roll into i386 until Prescott, which was pretty late in the non-64-bit capable family of CPUs, as its successor -- Conroe -- was 64-bit. Intel detuned some of the early Dual Core Pentiums, e.g. the Yonahs to not talk 64-bit. Not sure about AMD. There are probably more details in binutils, gcc, etc, that I'm missing and Kostik can expound on. -GarrettReceived on Tue Oct 18 2011 - 13:44:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC