On 10/25/2011 14:45, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Doug Barton >> Actually hex would still work since 0x.... would match. :) > > Yes, but if in the future, a revision number format is ever chosen > that doesn't include > 0x at the beginning, and is something like: > a23728ea7d592acc69b36875a482cdf3fd5c8d > > then this check would fail. However, none of this > exists yet in SVN, so it is not worth worry about > right now. Yes, that was what the smiley at the end of my sentence above was intending to convey. Sorry I wasn't more clear. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/Received on Tue Oct 25 2011 - 21:04:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC