On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:44:34PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > What, on the other hand, makes sense is to have the fix that > > > > should include: > > > > a) a KNOB (WITH_FBSD10_FIX or similar), > > > > b) that only is run from bsd.port.mk when OSVERSION>1000000 > > > > c) runs the latest version of the above patch. > > > > The KNOB's existence allow us to turn on the fix only for broken > > > > ports, and easily know what these broken ports are -- so we can > > > > poke maintainers from time to time about upstream fixes, ... > > > > > Erwin is currently running a build on i386-10 with this and the > following patches: > - bsd.port.mk patch from beat (based on ed_at_, jilles_at_ and stas_at_ patches) > - python patch from beat > - python patch from linimon > - WITH_FBSD10_FIX in: > - textproc/expat2 > - devel/pcre > - devel/libtool > - audio/libogg > Results by Monday. > These patches have now been committed to the tree, notably with lang/python27 missing in the above list but was included as well. There have been some proposals already and we can now incrementally improve the workaround and, more importantly, start fixing individual ports. Please note that the patch tries to balance between being a general enough fix to make it easy to get a working system running while not just swiping the whole issue under the rug and forget about it until the next release cycle. Make sure to send any fixes upstream to the hack can be removed from the ports again. Thanks for all your patience and thanks for all those involved, especially beat who sent many patches and improvements. Erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the future erwin_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Thu Oct 27 2011 - 08:21:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC