Re: In-kernel API for tasks, which could wait?

From: Lev Serebryakov <lev_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:11:31 +0400

Hello, Kostik.
You wrote 30 октября 2011 г., 19:03:39:

> See taskqueue(9). On the other hand, waiting for the enqueued task to
> finish is itself the sleepable action.
  I'll not wait for finishing. Task will put result to volatile atomic
field, and it's all. 

-- 
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev_at_serebryakov.spb.ru>

Received on Sun Oct 30 2011 - 14:11:41 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Marec: "Re: [9.0-RC1 FreeBSD] [amd64] buildworld fails on building lib/libss with CLANG"
Previous message: Kostik Belousov: "Re: In-kernel API for tasks, which could wait?"
In reply to: Kostik Belousov: "Re: In-kernel API for tasks, which could wait?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC