Re: BETA2 panic

From: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:59:21 +0200
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:53, Joel Dahl <joel_at_vnode.se> wrote:
> On 07-09-2011 10:59, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 22:42, Joel Dahl <joel_at_vnode.se> wrote:
>> > On 05-09-2011  9:02, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 08:24, Joel Dahl <joel_at_vnode.se> wrote:
>> >> > On 05-09-2011  5:09, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> >> >> On 5 September 2011 01:04, Joel Dahl <joel_at_vnode.se> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I upgraded my laptop from BETA1 to rev. 225367 today, and now my laptop panics just a few minutes after booting. This is 100% reproducible, it panics every time.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I've got a pic with the backtrace here: http://www.vnode.se/sc/panic_20110904.jpg
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> There weren't many commits between BETA1 and -HEAD in the wireless
>> >> >> area; would you please do a binary search of the kernel revisions (no
>> >> >> need to do full buildworlds) to find which commit broke it?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, I'll do that tonight.
>> >>
>> >> While doing so, can you enable at least some debugging?
>> >> wlandebug +state
>> >> or even better
>> >> wlandebug 0xffffffff
>> >>
>> >> It smells like that something is poking the SW bmiss handler while not
>> >> in RUN state and therefore you're hitting a KASSERT(). Question is if
>> >> the bmiss timer isn't stopped/drained somewhere or if there is too
>> >> excessive call.
>> >
>> > Exactly what in the wlandebug output are you looking for?  I've posted a pic
>> > at http://www.vnode.se/sc/panic_20110906.jpg showing what it looks like right
>> > before the panic.  This is with "wlandebug 0xffffffff".
>>
>> Thanks, so, looks like it is scanning while the panic happens. At that
>> point it should actually never ever care about beacon misses.. this is
>> strange, really.
>>
>> Can you try to comment out the call to ieee80211_beacon_miss() on line
>> 2936 in if_iwn.c? If the panic no longer happens the issue is
>> somewhere in the conditions before that call.
>
> Hm, this is with bwn(4), not iwn(4). :)

Uhm.. right, I'm sorry, missed that

Still.. two options, remove IEEE80211_FEXT_SWBMISS or try with
ifconfig wlan0 -bgscan

--
Bernhard
Received on Wed Sep 07 2011 - 08:59:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC