On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy_at_acm.org> wrote: > In any case, size isn't an issue for any of gptboot, gptzfsboot or > zfsboot (unlike boot2). For that matter, why do we need both > gptboot and gptzfsboot? It would be more convenient to have a > single GPT bootstrap that handled both UFS & ZFS. > gptzfsboot contains CDDL licensed code. This was done to allow users to build/install FreeBSD without any CDDL licensed boot code. ScotReceived on Sun Sep 11 2011 - 13:52:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC