on 12/09/2011 14:43 John Baldwin said the following: > I suspect some of the recent changes to shave space down for Clang have made > some of the optimization options no longer necessary. Just a note of all the options in question were added long before clang. > I think the patch is > fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like removing > nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2 as well. I personally agree, thank you for this suggestion. My current plan is to leave boot2 alone until stable/9 is branched, but to try to get zfs/gpt boot changes into 9.0. What do you think? -- Andriy GaponReceived on Mon Sep 12 2011 - 10:02:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC