Re: Very imprecise watchdogd(8) timeout

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:31:48 +0000
In message <CACqU3MV7mLD1Qrsd3c0cK2hjffErhBqTVbQXHHQ62r6-pn8uMA_at_mail.gmail.com>
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:

>>>I do not really care actually, but the manpage is wrong, and the code
>>>needlessly complicated.
>>
>> As I said: Feel free to improve.
>>
>How can I expect anything to get through, when I cannot even get an
>obvious use-after-free in the ipfw code fixed after months ? Or when
>I've been waiting to play with Warner's external compiler support
>patch for months ? Or when I can not get a build fix for 7-STABLE to
>get committed ? [and the list goes on...]

The oracle says:  Try next answer.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sun Sep 18 2011 - 17:31:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC