Re: Very imprecise watchdogd(8) timeout

From: Andriy Gapon <avg_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:49:13 +0300
on 16/09/2011 23:59 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
> in which case the current notifier-based architecture is broken. You
> may want to have a soft-watchdog triggering after 5s, and a fallback
> hardware watchdog triggering after 60s.

So let's start with the real problem, FreeBSD watchdog infrastructure doesn't
expose an API to do what you described above.
I think that it would be a rather small part to change the representation of
timeouts from current form to, say, value + unit encoding.

-- 
Andriy Gapon
Received on Mon Sep 19 2011 - 10:49:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC