Re: which "include" being used?

From: Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:24:48 +0200

* Garrett Cooper <yanegomi_at_gmail.com>, 20110921 04:34:
> I'd unpack a tarball from the most recent release. It's the easiest
> way to fix things :)..

Well, sometimes this is sufficient:

	cd /usr/src/include
	make install clean

That way you'll at least get the default system headers back.

-- 
 Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Wed Sep 21 2011 - 12:24:49 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Lucas Holt: "Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller"
Previous message: Warren Block: "Re: 9.0 beta2 & the new bsdinstaller"
In reply to: Garrett Cooper: "Re: which "include" being used?"
Next in thread: Lowell Gilbert: "Re: which "include" being used?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC