On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:32:55PM +0300, Alex Kozlov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:22:02PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> We should kille the load avarage as a measure for system activity, >> it only has any relevance if you run heavy CPU bound processes. > It may be true, but in current kernel from beginning of june I would I mean stable kernel from beginning of june... > see la about 0,01 in this situation. > > Note that cpu idling: > dev.cpu.0.freq: 300 > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2200/35000 1925/30625 1650/26250 1600/23000 1400/20125 1200/15000 1050/13125 900/11250 750/9375 600/7500 450/5625 300/3750 150/1875 > dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/1 C2/1 C3/17 > [...] > 11 root 2 155 ki31 0K 32K CPU1 1 29.4H 200.00% idle > > I think process accounting get broken or something like this. I updated to BETA-3, disabled all unnecessary modules (sound, net, wifi, ahci), boot in single user (no tricky programs, no external influence) and left laptop for 12+ hours, when I returned LA: 0,62 0,74 0,72 Anyone else observed something like that? If I boot from another flash with 8-STABLE from june, after a few hours I get LA: 0,01 0,00 0,00 , as expected. -- AdiosReceived on Mon Sep 26 2011 - 08:28:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC