At 04:38 PM 9/26/2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >There was also general sentiment that the rise of ZFS would allow >just this sort of fine-grained partitioning, which is a huge >advantage of its ability to create datasets on the fly. This >perception that ZFS is most of the future probably contributed to >the lack of strong opinions regarding the default UFS partition scheme. Unfortunately, because ZFS is licensed under a viral license (not the GPL, but nonetheless one that isn't compatible with the BSD philosophy), I wouldn't want to see this happen. I'd rather see Hammer backported from Dragonfly. --BrettReceived on Mon Sep 26 2011 - 21:09:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC