Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

From: Eduardo Morras <nec556_at_retena.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:07:28 +0200

At 11:18 27/09/2011, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for
> > their tenth version of their operating system ...
>
>At least there will be a long rest after
>the move to 10 is complete.. until FreeBSD 100.


Or move to hexadecimal

$ export UNAME_r='A.0-CURRENT'

Received on Tue Sep 27 2011 - 08:24:11 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: perryh_at_pluto.rain.com: "outside the box (Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT)"
Previous message: Gavin Atkinson: "Re: Choosing between DELAY(useconds) and pause()"
In reply to: Anton Shterenlikht: "Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT"
Next in thread: krad: "Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:18 UTC