Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:58:00 -0400
Hi,

2012/4/9 Alexander Motin <mav_at_freebsd.org>:
> [...]
>
> I have strong feeling that while this test may be interesting for profiling,
> it's own results in first place depend not from how fast scheduler is, but
> from the pipes capacity and other alike things. Can somebody hint me what
> except pipe capacity and context switch to unblocked receiver prevents
> sender from sending all data in batch and then receiver from receiving them
> all in batch? If different OSes have different policies there, I think
> results could be incomparable.
>
Let me disagree on your conclusion. If OS A does a task in X seconds,
and OS B does the same task in Y seconds, if Y > X, then OS B is just
not performing good enough. Internal implementation's difference for
the task can not be waived as an excuse for result's comparability.

 - Arnaud
Received on Tue Apr 10 2012 - 14:58:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC