On 2012-04-20 21:54, Jason Evans wrote: > On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... >> I think the best solution would be for jemalloc to avoid using obvious >> names like "chunksize" for its globals, because it is basically a >> library that could be linked to any sort of program out there. >> >> For example, it could prefix all its internal-use only globals with >> "jemalloc_" or some other mangling scheme. Jason, any thoughts? > > jemalloc has optional namespace mangling support built in for just this reason. I'll turn it on, hopefully today. Indeed, I had just found jemalloc/internal/private_namespace.h. :) It does seem to list only functions, not variables, is that right?Received on Fri Apr 20 2012 - 18:10:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:26 UTC