On 04/20/2012 01:14 PM, Jason Evans wrote: > On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 2012-04-20 21:54, Jason Evans wrote: >>> On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> ... >>>> I think the best solution would be for jemalloc to avoid using obvious >>>> names like "chunksize" for its globals, because it is basically a >>>> library that could be linked to any sort of program out there. >>>> >>>> For example, it could prefix all its internal-use only globals with >>>> "jemalloc_" or some other mangling scheme. Jason, any thoughts? >>> >>> jemalloc has optional namespace mangling support built in for just this reason. I'll turn it on, hopefully today. >> >> Indeed, I had just found jemalloc/internal/private_namespace.h. :) It >> does seem to list only functions, not variables, is that right? > > Ah right, functions only. Well then, I don't have any bright ideas for solving this problem in the short run. Prefixing your variables sounds right to me ... I'd use jem_ instead of spelling out jemalloc_, but either should work. DougReceived on Fri Apr 20 2012 - 18:25:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:26 UTC