Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain

From: Bob Bishop <rb_at_gid.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:38:03 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 26 Apr 2012, at 10:35, Konstantin Belousov wrote:

> I think it is time to stop building the toolchain static. I was told that
> original reasoning for static linking was the fear of loosing the ability
> to recompile if some problem appears with rtld and any required dynamic
> library. Apparently, current dependencies are much more spread, e.g. /bin/sh
> is dynamically linked [etc]

That seems like a bad mistake, because it would prevent even booting single-user if rtld/libraries are broken.

- --
Bob Bishop
rb_at_gid.co.uk




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFPmTOivMaT6aS3xb8RAi1NAJ4gyvwPgdqtZjAERJ0grBsZYo5xBQCgikdo
P4LXwI1rAbA23+29XWVV8w4=
=i8e3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thu Apr 26 2012 - 09:41:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:26 UTC