On Aug 2, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Scott Long wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Kevin Oberman <kob6558_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >> Doug makes some good points. > > No, he doesn't. He and Arnould being argumentative and accusatory where none of that is warranted. > > I used to run the devsummits, and we did tele-conference lines for remote people to participate. After I stepped down, others took it up and did the same thing. Usually, the lines were unused. I suspect that organizers simply stopped thinking about them after a while because of poor interest. There is no conspiracy of exclusion here, just simple human apathy. The "Watson/Losh connection" worked really well in BSDCan 2010 :). Advertising the teleconferencing lines might be an issue (I would have loved to have joined in some of the remote conferences, if for nothing more than be a fly on the wall, this year), but that's a separate thing aside. There's some misunderstanding, assumption, etc mixed together in this mailing chain that I think is probably better resolved with some face-to-face conversations or maybe just more rational (and less heated) discussion. Thanks! -GarrettReceived on Thu Aug 02 2012 - 14:44:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:29 UTC