On 8/18/2012 2:36 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <50300540.9060906_at_feral.com>, Matthew Jacob writes: > >> [...] that there might be a measurable >> difference for having to copy 4K (unaligned) than 1K (unaligned) to >> kernel space for disposition. > Actually, as far as I'm aware, the 4K would be page-aligned by > default due to our malloc(3) implementation. > >> Wasn't there just a recent discussion about running 1.x binaries? > 1.x binaries wouldn't notice and wouldn't be able to tell > if BUFSIZ is different in 10.x I wasn't concerned about those specifically- I was just using this as an example of leaving stuff alone. >> If you're going to talk about making a change to defaults, the default >> MAXPHYS and DLFTPHYS have been undersized for years now. > Indeed, but as I understand it, those require device driver changes ? Ah, well 10.X would be an ideal time to find out!Received on Sat Aug 18 2012 - 19:43:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:29 UTC