Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

On 08/20/2012 06:32, Alexander Motin wrote:
> I have no plans to converge them. I've just found problem in ULE, that
> was replicated into 4BSD and it would be strange to fix one without
> another. But fixing it exposed another old problem specific to 4BSD,
> which I fixed reusing logically equivalent code from ULE. I saw no
> reason to reinvent a wheel there, same as to not fix obvious bug. Sure,
> it can change behavior in some way, but ULE is not guilty.

Thank you for that explanation.

-- 

    I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do
    something.  And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
    I can do.
			-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)