Re: [HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT

From: Simon L. B. Nielsen <simon_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:51:24 +0100
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Ulrich Spörlein <uqs_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 22:24:56 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> If you are not using geli(4) on -CURRENT (AKA FreeBSD 10) you can safely
>> ignore this mail. If you are, please read on!
>>
>> -CURRENT users of geli(4) should be advised that, a geli(4) device may
>> have weak master key, if the provider is created on -CURRENT system
>> built against source code between r238116 (Jul 4 17:54:17 2012 UTC)
>> and r239184 (non-inclusive, Aug 10 18:43:29 2012 UTC).
>>
>> One can verify if its provider was created with weak keys by running:
>>
>>       # geli dump <provider> | grep version
>>
>> If the version is 7 and the system did not include this fix (r239184)
>> when provider was initialized, then the data has to be backed up,
>> underlying provider overwritten with random data, system upgraded and
>> provider recreated.
>>
>> Thanks to Fabian Keil for reporting the issue, Pawel Jakub Dawidek for
>> fixing it, and Xin Li for drafting this text.
>>
>> PS. This only affects FreeBSD 10 / -CURRENT, and as -CURRENT isn't
>> supported by the FreeBSD Security Team, we are not releasing an
>> advisory, just this heads up.
>
> I haven't read commit mails in a very long time, but is there code in
> place that will issue a warning upon geli attach if version 7 is
> detected? While -CURRENT is not supported, there might be a lot of disks
> initialized with version 7 and they'll eventually be upgraded to
> 10.0-RELEASE (the OS, not necessarily the geli volumes).

No, the bad code was only in head for about a month. I'm fine with
having a warning, but somebody has to code it.

-- 
Simon L. B. Nielsen
Received on Fri Aug 24 2012 - 13:51:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:30 UTC