Re: Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX?

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:53:46 +0200
John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no> writes:
> > The limit we had was insufficient for 8 GB of swap.
> In absolute or practical terms?

This whole thing started because I have a machine with 8 GB swap that
ran out of swzone.

> At this point i386 is going to be used on smaller systems
> (e.g. netbooks, etc.), not servers that have lots of swap.

I don't think it's unreasonable for an i386 box to be maxed out on RAM
(4 GB) and have twice that amount of swap.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no
Received on Sat Aug 25 2012 - 08:53:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:30 UTC