On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:07:48PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov > <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle <tim_at_kientzle.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim Kientzle <tim_at_kientzle.com> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Hi, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I have a wrapper script that builds packages in a chroot environment > >> >>>> which happily runs on release 6 thru 9 and earlier 10 but fails with: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory > >> >>>> > >> >>>> on a recent -CURRENT. > >> >>> > >> >>> libarchive does do an initial getvfsbyname() when you ask it > >> >>> to traverse a directory tree so that it can accurately handle later > >> >>> requests about mountpoints and filesystem types. This code > >> >>> is admittedly a little intricate. > >> >> > >> >> The problem most likely is the fact that all mountpoints are > >> >> exposed via chroot, thus, if it's checking to see if a mountpoint > >> >> exists, it may exist outside of the chroot. > >> >> > >> > > >> > I reviewed the code to refresh my memory. Some > >> > of what I said before was not quite right. > >> > > >> > Libarchive's directory traversal tracks information about > >> > the filesystem type so that clients such as bsdtar can > >> > efficiently skip synthetic filesystems (/dev or /proc) or > >> > network filesystems (NFS or SMB mounts). > >> > > >> > The net effect is something like this: > >> > > >> > For each file: > >> > stat() or lstat() or fstat() the file > >> > look up dev number in an internal cache > >> > if the dev number is new: > >> > fstatfs() the open fd to get the FS name > >> > getvfsbyname() to identify the FS type > >> > > >> > Unless there's a logic error in libarchive itself, this > >> > would suggest that somehow fstatfs() is returning > >> > a filesystem type that getvfsbyname() can't > >> > identify. > >> > > >> > Paul: > >> > What filesystem are you using? > >> > > >> > What does "mount" show? > >> > > >> > Does it work outside the chroot? > >> > >> I also see the same on the redports.org build machines. > >> It builds within a jail there which is completely on a tmpfs. > >> Interestinly everything is fine with a 10-CURRENT/amd64 > >> jail but it breaks in a 10-CURRENT/i386 jail. Both are > >> running on the same 10-CURRENT/amd64 which is > >> around 2 months old. > >> > >> https://redports.org/buildarchive/20120814130205-56327/ > > > > Try this. > > Is it possible that this requires the host system to be quite > new? The commit in HEAD seems to doesn't help in my > case. Host is 9-stable from Jun 27 and jail is 10-current from > a few days ago. Doh, the fix was in kernel, and I merged the change back to stable only on August 27. Running HEAD world on stable is not supported anyway.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:30 UTC