On 2012-12-01 12:05, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 01/12/2012 12:59 Garrett Cooper said the following: >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Taku YAMAMOTO <taku_at_tackymt.homeip.net> wrote: >>> When I built the world as of r237813, clang reported a warning which >>> caught my attention. >>> >>> ===> sys/boot/zfs (all) >>> clang -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -DBOOTPROG=\"zfsloader\" -I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../common -I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../.. -I. -I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../../../lib/libstand -I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../../cddl/boot/zfs -ffreestanding -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -msoft-float -Wformat -Wall -DNDEBUG -std=gnu99 -Qunused-arguments -c /usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/zfs.c -o zfs.o >>> In file included from /usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/zfs.c:48: >>> /usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/zfsimpl.c:2033:19: warning: array index 264 is past the end of the array (which contains 192 elements) [-Warray-bounds] >>> memcpy(path, &dn.dn_bonus[sizeof(znode_phys_t)], >>> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> /usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../../cddl/boot/zfs/zfsimpl.h:788:2: note: array 'dn_bonus' declared here >>> uint8_t dn_bonus[DN_MAX_BONUSLEN - sizeof (blkptr_t)]; >>> ^ >>> >>> I don't have a zfs-powered machine, so I'm not sure whether this >>> warning is false-positive or not. >> >> I'm seeing the same warnings trying to build HEAD r242903 with >> clang on amd64. Andriy CCed. > > I believe that there is no actual problem there. Indeed. The ZFS code seems to be using the dnode_phys_t::dn_bonus field as a sort of flexible struct member. These specific warnings can be ignored, or turned off.Received on Sun Dec 02 2012 - 14:37:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:32 UTC