Hello, thank you for your answer. Unfortunately, I'm unexperienced with FreeBSD, and am absolutely unfamiliar with hardware specifics. During this mail conversion, I have heard abour BAR for the first time, and therefore, I know neither what exactly I should do (e.g. how I can find the start of bar, which register offsets would be interesting, etc.), nor what the results would tell me. I'm sorry if I'm tedious, but I would be very grateful if you could provide some more guidance. Thank you very much! On Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2012 at 7:43 PM, "John Baldwin" <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > >On Friday, November 23, 2012 5:56:02 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Thanks for this! >> >> I'm sorry it hasn't gotten any more attention. I've cc'ed john >because >> he understands the PCI-PCI resource allocation stuff and I >currently >> don't; I'm hoping he can stare at this and see what's going on. >> >> But yes, if it were an ath(4) problem, the NIC would be returning >> 0xdeadbeef, 0xdeadc0de, etc. It wouldn't return 0xffffffff - that >> happens when there's nothing mapped at that address. >> >> The PCI config space that you've provided shows BAR(0) is >programmed >correctly.. > >Your dmesg shows that another device behind the same PCI-PCI >bridge is working >fine (fxp0), so the bridge is configured correctly. Also, the PCI >command >register for ath0 has memory decoding enabled, so everything >should be fine >from PCI's perspective. Note that if you want to examine specific >registers >you can use dd with /dev/mem (albeit carefully), e.g. > > dd if=/dev/mem bs=4 iseek=((start of bar + reg offset)/4) >count=1 | hd > >to read a single 32-bit register. I think that the card is in >fact returning >the value you see from its registers. I would do some reads of >other >registers using dd to see if all of the device registers are >returning -1 or >if only certain registers are. > >-- >John BaldwinReceived on Fri Dec 07 2012 - 09:29:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:33 UTC