Quoting Scott Long <scottl_at_samsco.org> (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:42:39 -0700): > On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> Quoting Scott Long <scottl_at_samsco.org> (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 >> 17:45:04 -0700): >> >>> On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or >>>> shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)? >>>> - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? >>>> - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only? >>>> - if_hme: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only? >>> >>> If these aren't for i386 hardware, then why would they need to be >>> in the i386 GENERIC profile? >> >> I didn't told they aren't for i386 (Sun and Apple produce(d) x86 >> hardware). If they would have been non-x86 drivers (I assume you've >> seen the answer from Marius), the bug would have been that they are >> build as modules on x86. >> > > Let it go. Can you please rephrase this for a non-native english speaker please? I don't understand what is the subject of your message. Do you ask to not include those 3 into GENERIC, or do you ask to forget you asked initially? Bye, Alexander. -- Every time I look at you I am more convinced of Darwin's theory. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild _at_ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137Received on Thu Feb 23 2012 - 07:22:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:24 UTC