At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: >Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even >for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is >written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE >was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated >version in the ports suited our needs. > >Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I >filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. > >I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use >CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried >devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of >configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and >not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. > >devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many >of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, >but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. > >Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, >I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the >focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks >is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. > >Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm >also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity >to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE >is needed. > >Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. >OliverReceived on Thu Feb 23 2012 - 12:43:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:24 UTC