On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote: > On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote: >> any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future? >> that would >> make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options, >> such as >> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 would simply work by setting >> CFLAGS.gcc=-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 e.g. > > You already can: > > CFLAGS.cc= cc_cflags_here > CFLAGS.clang= clang_cflags_here > > CFLAGS+= generic_cflags_here > CFLAGS+= ${CFLAGS.${CC}} > > > -aDe I think was asking for adding a third... .cc for base gcc .clang for .. clang...... and .gcc for ports gcc4x .. At least, thats how I read it, I could be wrong, it's happened before. ChuckReceived on Tue Feb 28 2012 - 23:08:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:24 UTC