Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

From: <matthew_at_phoronix.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800
   Thanks for the comment Arnaud.   For comparative benchmarking on    [1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva= riable leaves it in the default
   configuration 'in the way the developers or= vendor wanted it for
   production'.  This is by rule.
   However, i= nvariable the community or vendor for platforms that post
   poor scores on be= nchmark cry foul about using the default config.
   'it should be tuned,= no-one deploys an untuned system' or 'the system
   is configured for a diffe= rent workload'.
   The response from us to this comes in two forms. &nb= sp;
   1) If it is the wrong workload for the platform, do a public pos= t
   explaining and analysing the results.  Highlighting the rationale fo   r the concious reduction in performance (ie: journaling filesystems
   with ba= rriers suffer in some write benchmarks for the sake of
   filesystem integrity= .
   2) If tuning can have a material impact on the results, post a t   uning guide with step by step and rationale.  Ie: educate the
   communit= y and users.
   Michael and I have had many discussions with vendors an= d communities
   on this.  In almost all cases, the vendor has either cha= nged the
   default configuration or accepted the results as valid.
   As = a service to the community or vendor that publishes the tuning
   guide, Micha= el is more than willing to redo a tuned vs untuned
   comparison.  To dat= e, the communities have never taken us up on that
   offer.  In part, thi= s affects [2]Phoronix.com's perception in the
   public, but that is more of a result of a one sided d= iscussion by a
   party external to a particular community (with a healthy tou= ch of
   journalisticly pumped compare & contrast).  For the FreeBSD    community, who else outside of the FreeBSD community actually runs
   public c= omparisons of FreeBSD against anything?
   Matthew

   -- Sent from my HP Pre3
     _________________________________________________________________

   On Jan 4, 2012 1:58 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar_at_gmail.com&g= t;
   wrote:
   Hi,
   
   On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM,= <matthew_at_phoronix.com> wrote:
   > Thanks.
   >
   &= gt; My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the
   benchma= rk to
   > ensure expected behaviour.
   >
   Why should you= have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle
   Server
   install ? If = not, you should not have to tune the FreeBSD
   install,
   that wouldn't b= e fair. If you tune FreeBSD, you should tune the
   Oracle
   Server instal= l too. It is pretty easy to win at least 30% in
   performance for certa= in workload by choosing the right kernel
   configuration.
   
   = - Arnaud
   
   > The installation, execution and comparison agai= nst the benchmarks
   in the
   > article is fairly simple.
   >= 
   > Note that some tuning may not be relevant or recommended (ie: s= ome
   of the fs
   > benchmarks are sensitive to barriers and other syn= chronous
   operations).  I'd
   > recommend bowing out of a benchm= ark with a 'we're going to be
   slower since
   > the default configura= tion is this way for the following reason' if
   this is
   > the case.= 
   >
   > Thanks 'someone'.
   >
   > Matthew
>
   >
   >  Dec 16, 2011 8:46 AM, Adrian Chadd <a= drian_at_freebsd.org>
   wrote:
   >
   > Can someone please write= up a nice, concise blog post somewhere
   > outlining all of this?= 
   >
   > Extra bonus points if it's a blog that is picked up = by
   > blogs.freebsdish.org and/or some of the other BSD sites.
>
   > Guys/girls/fuzzy things - this is 2011; people look at sh= iny
   blog
   > sites with graphs rather than mailing lists. Sorry, we = lost
   that
   > battle. :)
   >
   >
   >
   >= Adrian
   > _______________________________________________
   &g= t; freebsd-performance_at_freebsd.org mailing list
   > http://lists.fre= ebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
   > To unsubscribe, se= nd any mail to
   > "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
<= br>

References

   1. 3D"http://Phoronix.com"/
   2. 3D"http://Phoronix.com"/
Received on Wed Jan 04 2012 - 21:31:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:22 UTC