On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following: > > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this > > affects ports/misc/compat8x/ > > Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough. > There is no direct relation between COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and misc/compat8x. > COMPAT_FREEBSD<X> options are only needed when going from release X to release X+1 > there was a change to an existing system call at the kernel-userland boundary. > A side note: kernel options affect only what's in the kernel, quite obviously. > misc/compat<X>x contains versions of shared libraries from release X that are no > longer present in X+1. Additional twist is that not every change at the kernel/usermode boundary is covered with backward-compatibility shims. Recent example is the CAM ABI change, which makes libcam.so.5 from the compat8x useless.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:23 UTC