Hi, as I succesfully installed FreeBSD on Mac Mini (older powerpc model with G4 CPU) I tried to use mount_nullfs to share some files for more systems. I use this method for years on i386 and amd64 platforms for years now to share sources and other files. Basically I want to have small system specific slice/partition and large shared data area. System sources are in shared area as well as some working area (think /usr/src and /usr/obj directories). This does not work with powerpc for me. With sources csup'ped this morning, full system rebuild with GENERIC kernel, it is enough for me to issue mount_nullfs /data/src10 /usr/src csup /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile and system panic occurs, with following on system console: panic: mtx_lock() of spin mutex (null) _at_ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2670 cpuid = 0 KDB: enter: panic [ thread pid 1442 tid 100095 ] Stopped at 0x40f734: addi r0, r0, 0x0 db> At this point, I am able to interact with system, the question for me is what I want to get from it :) I tried bt with following result: Tracing pid 1442 tid 100095 td 0x2d6b000 0xe22c26d0: at panic+0x274 0xe22c2730: at _mtx_lock_flags+0xc4 0xe22c2760: at vgonel+0x330 0xe22c27b0: at vrecycle+0x54 0xe22c27d0: at null_inactive+0x30 0xe22c27f0: at VOP_INACTIVE_APV+0xdc 0xe22c2810: at vinactive+0x98 0xe22c2850: at vputx+0x344 0xe22c28a0: at vput+0x18 0xe22c28c0: at kern_statat_vnhook+0x108 0xe22c29d0: at kern_statat+0x18 0xe22c29f0: at kern_lstat+0x2c 0xe22c2a10: at sys_lstat+0x30 0xe22c2a90: at trap+0x388 0xe22c2b60: at powerpc_interrupt+0x108 0xe22c2b90: user SC trap by _end+0x40d88c70: srr1=0xd032 r1=0xffaf9a70 cr=0x28004044 xer=0x20000000 ctr=0x41a0ac40 db> Does this shed any light for someone with more knowledge here? My gut feeling is there is some endianness issue at play, the same nullfs usage works for me flawlessly on both i386 and amd64 systems, so it could not be 32 vs 64 bit issue at least. At line 2670 of /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c I see end of function void vgonel(struct vnode *vp) VI_LOCK(vp); vp->v_vnlock = &vp->v_lock; vp->v_op = &dead_vnodeops; vp->v_tag = "none"; vp->v_type = VBAD; } so the question seems to be reduced to 'why is vp null?' or is my small attempt on analyse flawed... Regards, MilanReceived on Tue Jan 24 2012 - 17:11:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:23 UTC