On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Hiroki Sato <hrs_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> David Wolfskill <david_at_catwhisker.org> wrote >> in <20120709131957.GI1552_at_albert.catwhisker.org>: >> >> da> Just finished updating from r238227 to r238290 on the "head" slice of my >> da> laptop, and was unable to make use of the wlan(4) NIC; I captured the >> da> following via cut/paste from ttyv0: >> (snip) >> da> >> da> I glanced through the list of commits to head in that range, but >> da> didn't note anything glaringly obvious (yet). >> da> >> da> I hadn't tried a wired NIC on the laptop; I can, if there's anything >> da> likely to be of value in doing so. >> >> Gr, it may be due to my change of r238279. I am investigating it. >> >> -- Hiroki > > The issue with wpa_supplicant failing is due to the wlan0 interface > being cloned from one of the new usbus/usbpf devices instead of the > actual wireless network device: > > brandon_at_m6500[/home/brandon] > $ ifconfig -v wlan0 > wlan0: flags=1<UP> metric 0 mtu 0 > nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> > groups: usbus > > How this might be happening is strange to me, how can the system be > confused as to which interface to clone from? Off-by-one error > somewhere? Hiroki just fixed it a little while ago. -GarrettReceived on Wed Jul 11 2012 - 01:20:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:28 UTC