On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:03:04AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 11.07.2012 02:00, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Steve Kargl > ><sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > >>On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41:38PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>>I do have all this in the kernel, see below. > >>>Still if I don't have device ata, I get no cd: > >>> > >> > >>Well, then, leave 'device ata' in your config file. > >> > >>Groucho: Doctor, it hurts when I do this. > >>yada yada > > > > The UPDATING directions don't say this is required, so mav_at_ might > >want to know (CCed). > > The UPDATING record tells nothing about removing `device ata`. `options > ATA_CAM` only trims it from full ATA infrastructure to a CAM driver for > legacy ATA controllers not supported by the new, more advanced drivers > ahci(4), mvs(4) and siis(4). ata(4) man page was updated respectively. > It is not mandatory any more. You would be free to remove `device ata` > from your kernel if you had no such hardware, but obviously you have it. Thank you for the clarification. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423Received on Wed Jul 11 2012 - 06:51:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:28 UTC