Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

From: Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:43:46 -0700
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > 
> > On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> > 
> > Not having R would be a bit pain in my backside.  That's one of the practical considerations that I was talking about.  It is very real, and if I have to, I'll commit the #define junk I railed against to get it back.  Please, let's get some progress.  I have some time to help.
> > 
> 
> Not having complex functions is a PITA for software defined radio programs...
> 
> I submitted this PR in frustration. I know, I meant to close it already.
> 
> >Number:         147599
> >Category:       kern
> >Synopsis:       [libm] [patch] Import netbsd complex functions into our libm
> 

You submitted on June 6th, 2010.  I commented on why
the patch should be avoided on June 15th, 2010.  I see
no follow-ups from you that give the details on how
you went about testing and fixing the code?

-- 
Steve
Received on Wed Jul 11 2012 - 19:43:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:28 UTC