> On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 05 June 2012 12:48:20 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > > > In message <3506767.Fvm2KmtnYf at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes: > > > > > > > > > > On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's already there. If you want the ports as of FreeBSD 4.x EOL > > > > then the tag is "RELEASE_4_EOL". If you want ports as of FreeBSD > > > > 9.0 then the tag is "RELEASE_9_9_0". > > > > > > > I did not know this. Do you have a link for this? I never read about it. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not branched. > > I understand this that I can use these tags on the FreeBSD sources but not on the ports. > > I never tried this on the ports. I sent a long reply to your earlier message on freebsd-ports explaining exactly this -- how each Ports tree snapshot has a version number: the date spec. Also, how a few special snapshots also have a second version number: the release tag. I also explained how to find and use these, with and without cvs. Am I wasting my time by trying to answer your questions, E.? b.Received on Tue Jun 05 2012 - 05:08:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:27 UTC