On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:51:09PM +0200, Jan Sieka wrote: > Hello group! > > I have a few questions regarding adding symbols to > lib/libc/<arch>/Symbol.map, so that function signatures are exported: > - what are the conventions regarding putting symbols in FBSD_X.Y or > FBSDprivate_X.Y sections of the aforementioned files? FBSD_X.Y are for public interfaces, i.e. non-system code is supposed to link to symbols from that versions. FBSDprivate is for exclusive base system use (so to say). We do not guarantee ABI stability for private. > - when it is necessary to bump X.Y numbers? Currently, it is done when major branch is created. > - what is the difference between FBSD_X.Y and FBSDprivate_X.Y sections? This is a repeat. > > The above questions arose from the discussion on freebsd-arm_at_ > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2012-June/003555.html) > which concerns fixing Perl on ARM. The fix is to add __flt_rounds > function signature to lib/libc/arm/Symbols.map. Regarding this fix it > appears (after Symbols.map files analysis and checking their SVN > history) that adding this symbol is just a bug fix and should be put to > FBSD_1.0 section without incrementing numbers. But I don't have more > in-depth explanation so sending this email. No, since you are adding it in the CURRENT-10 timeframe, it goes to FBSD_1.3. > > Anyone can comment on the above questions or point to some documentation > (I've searched Developer's Handbook and Internet but found nothing)? http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/symver/freebsd_versioning.txt In fact, I do not like this policy, and would some day write a proposal, which essentially requests creation of separate version for each ABI change. But what is referenced is the current accepted project policy.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:27 UTC