Re: sysctl filesystem ?

From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek_at_wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:06:58 +0200 (CEST)

as well as we don't depend of /proc for normal operation we shouldn't for 
say /proc/sysctl

improvements are welcome, better documentation is welcome, changes to what 
is OK - isn't.

Received on Tue Jun 26 2012 - 04:07:02 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wojciech Puchar: "Re: sysctl filesystem ?"
Previous message: Konstantin Belousov: "Re: Tmpfs panic in -current"
In reply to: Arnaud Lacombe: "sysctl filesystem ?"
Next in thread: Chris Rees: "Re: sysctl filesystem ?"
Reply: Chris Rees: "Re: sysctl filesystem ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:28 UTC