> and/or get it wrong. sysctl has some file-system like properties, but on the > whole, it's not a file system -- it's much more like an SNMP MIB. > > While you can map anything into anything (including Turing machines), I think > the sysctl command line tool and API, despite its limitations, is a better me too. i REALLY appreciate the way FreeBSD do this. pseudo-filesystems are sometimes good but making them default method is bad. Current way is simple. Or actually - less complicated as i think for example - XML in system output is not.Received on Tue Jun 26 2012 - 10:39:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:28 UTC