Re: [CFC/CFT] large changes in the loader(8) code

On 28.06.2012 13:19, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 27.06.2012 23:27, Andrey V. Elsukov пишет:
> 
>> 1. You are against from:
>> Our loader detects that primary GPT header is damaged. It tries to read
>> backup GPT header from the last LBA and it detects that there is
>> "GEOM::" signature. It tries to read one previous sector and there is
>> *valid*  GPT header.
> 
> Can we do the other way round? I.e. the GPT header is at the last sector. And if GEOM singature is
> not found at last sector of the disk
> and this sector is a GPT header then look at the previous sector?

Then this sector contains GPT table.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov