I am going to post the ministat results of my tests: 1) Text sort of 167-Mb file (1,000,000 random lines, each contains several fields, each field is either a floating point number or a binary string with random symbols between 0 and 255). Sorted on second field (-k 2,2 option): ==================================================== x OGNU + NGNU * NBSD (multi-threaded) +--------------------------------------------------+ | x * + | | x x * +++ | |xxxxx x * ** * +++* * * *| | |_A_| |_______M_|AA___________| | +--------------------------------------------------+ N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 10 5.758 5.937 5.848 5.8508 0.057276716 + 10 6.29 6.366 6.332 6.3302 0.02123833 Difference at 95.0% confidence 0.4794 +/- 0.0405862 8.19375% +/- 0.693687% (Student's t, pooled s = 0.0431954) * 10 6.067 7.228 6.225 6.3449 0.35979422 Difference at 95.0% confidence 0.4941 +/- 0.242055 8.445% +/- 4.13713% (Student's t, pooled s = 0.257616) ================================================== 2) Same file, numeric sort on the same field (-k 2,2 -n option): x OGNU.n + NGNU.n * NBSD.n (multi-threaded) +--------------------------------------------------+ |**** * x x x +++| |**** * xx x x ++++| | |MA_| |__A_| |A | +--------------------------------------------------+ N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 10 7.142 7.338 7.216 7.2179 0.066727389 + 10 8.231 8.307 8.271 8.2677 0.022701199 Difference at 95.0% confidence 1.0498 +/- 0.0468287 14.5444% +/- 0.648785% (Student's t, pooled s = 0.0498392) * 10 6.91 7.094 6.98 6.9864 0.061449528 Difference at 95.0% confidence -0.2315 +/- 0.0602683 -3.2073% +/- 0.834983% (Student's t, pooled s = 0.0641428) ============================================================= On these two tests, all three program produced the same output. So, on text sort, NBSD is slightly slower than GNU; on simple numeric sort, NBSD is slightly faster. I did not use ministat for complex numeric sort (-g) because the performance difference is huge (in favor of NBSD) and it would make no sense. Thanks Oleg > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Oleg Moskalenko > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 6:45 PM > To: FreeBSD Current > Subject: RE: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT > > Hi > > As promised, I am supplying an example of comparison between several > sort programs. > > The test file is a randomly generated 1,000,000 lines, each line > contain a single floating point number. > > We are going to sort it three ways - as text, as -n numeric sort, and > as -g numeric sort, with 4 programs: > 1) Old BSD/GNU sort 5.3.0 > 2) New GNU sort 8.15 > 3) New BSD sort, single threaded > 4) New BSD sort, multi-threaded > > The system is a 3-CPUs system, 1.5Gb of RAM, FreeBSD version 8.2. All > times are in seconds. Locale C. > > ============================================== > > TEXT SORT > > sys user real > Old BSD/GNU sort: 0.0 1.692 2.008 > New GNU sort: 0.0 2.279 1.605 > New BSD sort, st: 0.0 1.964 2.300 > New BSD sort, mt: 0.0 2.385 1.897 > > ============================================== > > NUMERIC SORT -n > > sys user real > Old BSD/GNU sort: 0.0 4.357 4.674 > New GNU sort: 0.0 8.839 5.134 > New BSD sort, st: 0.0 5.308 5.592 > New BSD sort, mt: 0.0 4.581 2.489 > > ============================================== > > NUMERIC SORT -g > > sys user real > Old BSD/GNU sort: 0.0 45.378 45.630 > New GNU sort: ~450 ~121 ~300 > New BSD sort, st: 0.33 4.334 5.992 > New BSD sort, mt: 11.140 4.624 8.983 > > =============================================== > > Thanks > Oleg > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current- > unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Sat Jun 30 2012 - 21:53:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:28 UTC