On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:16:45 -0500, Gary Palmer <gpalmer_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > Does the datestamp on /usr/sbin/named reflect when you built the world > or could named have been left over from a previous install? > > WITHOUT_BIND="yes" doesn't delete named if its already installed (not > sure > if 'make delete-old' cleans it up or not) "stat /usr/sbin/named" leaves me in shame - yes, it is left over from a previous buildworld. (Thanks also to others, whose suggestion of same problem just came in from where I sit.) On to next problem... > As for named running, if you do > > sh /etc/rc.d/named restart > > does it succeed? If so, the 'named_enable="no"' flag must be set wrong. "sh /etc/rc.d/named restart" gives exactly what you would expect ("Cannot `restart` named. Set named_enable to YES..."). > Also check to make sure that its not named from ports or some other > location (e.g. check fstat or lsof or something to make sure its actually > /usr/sbin/named and not from some other location) "fstat | grep /named" returns nothing (!), likewise "fstat | grep /sbin". However: # procstat -b `pgrep named` PID COMM PATH 63121 named /usr/sbin/named 63090 named /usr/sbin/named (I also never used ports BIND.) I would really like to figure this out before I do the necessary work to remove unwanted BIND from the system. Processes running without apparent reason, indicates something else is wrong. Thanks for the help so far. I am continuing to poke the system, just looking for the right tool to find out how this got started (also grepping logs which show start but don't seem to show why).Received on Fri Mar 02 2012 - 22:48:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:24 UTC