On 03/16/2012 18:47, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote: >>> In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is >>> simpler than that: >>> http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/ > [...] >> This sounds like a good solution to more than one problem. Does anyone >> know why they indirect through 2 sets of symlinks? That article doesn't >> touch on the "why?" only the what. > > Do you mean, why do they do > /usr/bin/vim -> /etc/alternatives/vim -> /usr/bin/vim.gtk > instead of > /usr/bin/vim -> /usr/bin/vim.gtk > ? > > Someone's choice of a vi-like editor would be considered configuration, > so it belongs in /etc. If that's the *only* reason then it seems to me that it would be better solved by being able to express that in a config file in /usr/local/etc which the alternate-updater script takes into account. But I need to install debian for other reasons anyway, so I'll look at this in more detail. Thanks. -- This .signature sanitized for your protectionReceived on Sat Mar 17 2012 - 03:08:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC