Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available

From: Doug Barton <dougb_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:34:30 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 03/17/2012 03:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:

> Why to symlink, this is 1/ because it concerns user/admin
> configuration,

I get that, but why is a conf file not the right answer? We could even
put the conf file in /etc if we decide that this is a feature that
should be in the base. Having 2 symlinks just seems like overkill.

> 2 it allows to change it even with your /usr/local/bin mounted RO.

I don't understand this bit, sorry. Aren't we talking about symlinks
in / and /usr pointing to alternate versions in either /, /usr, or
/usr/local? I don't see how anything would need to be written in
/usr/local with either 1 symlink or 2.


Doug

- -- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPZR+GAAoJEFzGhvEaGryER/sH/A8nuMDQ18cmm1OkboCn1ZKY
DFb8THBfCwiXlpN7VYqz6YaYwumIooTO6108sKPbBoC3UPE7sZN7F9ENFbihkYrg
Gq3YPhn6h6Wkvt61s+2Om/fkJEUQvy0u+9WMJE5YExBKpeIBMSxkhmTj9B7WKfS5
hONNUVWww4pSvBF4eMCTf41mtI54jlsOrPZYJofTMvOc26T8qLlzgJEPLp+uAlOx
/92rRcKklIkLokUzWzFO/XdnmzqkpeLw0Oo46iIWer/4uFUzQl5+WcJ+kDwykRzB
l2Oai0X5IOA/YKuEsToVvLOydBpZ2uBqgfSEe5Hzn2P0Vts/i5ckVHqFN5txPkw=
=Jvry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sat Mar 17 2012 - 22:34:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC