-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/17/2012 03:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Why to symlink, this is 1/ because it concerns user/admin > configuration, I get that, but why is a conf file not the right answer? We could even put the conf file in /etc if we decide that this is a feature that should be in the base. Having 2 symlinks just seems like overkill. > 2 it allows to change it even with your /usr/local/bin mounted RO. I don't understand this bit, sorry. Aren't we talking about symlinks in / and /usr pointing to alternate versions in either /, /usr, or /usr/local? I don't see how anything would need to be written in /usr/local with either 1 symlink or 2. Doug - -- This .signature sanitized for your protection -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPZR+GAAoJEFzGhvEaGryER/sH/A8nuMDQ18cmm1OkboCn1ZKY DFb8THBfCwiXlpN7VYqz6YaYwumIooTO6108sKPbBoC3UPE7sZN7F9ENFbihkYrg Gq3YPhn6h6Wkvt61s+2Om/fkJEUQvy0u+9WMJE5YExBKpeIBMSxkhmTj9B7WKfS5 hONNUVWww4pSvBF4eMCTf41mtI54jlsOrPZYJofTMvOc26T8qLlzgJEPLp+uAlOx /92rRcKklIkLokUzWzFO/XdnmzqkpeLw0Oo46iIWer/4uFUzQl5+WcJ+kDwykRzB l2Oai0X5IOA/YKuEsToVvLOydBpZ2uBqgfSEe5Hzn2P0Vts/i5ckVHqFN5txPkw= =Jvry -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Sat Mar 17 2012 - 22:34:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC